lava-users

lava-users@lists.lavasoftware.org

1 participants
926 discussions

2020.02: docker in docker support for fastboot docker deploy

by Stephen Lawrence

Hi, After the recent Linaro Tech Day LAVA presentation I have been looking into the new support in LAVA v2020.02 for deploying fastboot on the host to docker rather than lxc. I am running my lava worker in a docker image derived from the linaro lava docker images and so wanted to ask if the new feature supported docker in docker for the fastboot containerisation? Regards Steve

5 years, 2 months

Submit Job

by Nikolina nici_nigel

Hello, I just started working with hardware, firmware and lava. You have a big documentation, but for me it's sometimes difficult to find something. I wanted to submit a job on just one device like my "bbb-03" and not on every beaglebone-black. Is there a device-tag to choose a device like "device_type: "? My next question is if there is also a worker tag for a job submit? For example I just want to run all "beaglebone-black" on my "worker2". Is there also a list of all job submissions tags with examples? I just found the one for the "actions" part. I'm sorry for disturbing and maybe the stupid question. But thank you for your answer in advance. I wish you a nice day

5 years, 3 months

Delaying LAVA Release

by Remi Duraffort

Hello, As you know, we are trying to release a new version of LAVA every month. We are delaying this month release (2020.03) due to some issues and crashes that we found in the last days. Issues where found on staging.vlo, lavafed and meta-lava, proving that the CI is working. Where are currently working on fixing the issues and proving that LAVA is ready for release. The next release should be ready for the end of next week and would be called 2020.04. Rgds -- Rémi Duraffort LAVA Architect Linaro

5 years, 3 months

Confusion between LAVA job definition "name" vs UI "description"

by Paul Sokolovsky

Hello, I recently went "on a spree" to submit a number of LAVA UI issues either accumulated in my mind or just caught on exhaustive search for a feature I miss. They are at https://git.lavasoftware.org/lava/lava/-/issues?scope=all&author_username=p… and I believe all of them worth fixing (and don't bring in concerns like backward compatibility). So, they're up for triaging by the maintainers and feedback from the community to confirm they're indeed such. (Then, I'd be able to help with addressing them, as much as I can). There're more issues, about which I'm less sure. So, instead of submitting such as bugs, let me ask for a feedback in the email, starting with this one: When you prepare a job definition YAML to submit to LAVA, in it you something like: job_name: 'zephyr-net-ping #823-2ac65a24' It may be not immediately obvious, but what you had as a "job name" in the YAML, ends up as a "description" when you visit job list in the LAVA UI (E.g. at https://validation.linaro.org/scheduler/alljobs). "Is it that much of a difference? Most people wouldn't even notice!" you may think, and I can only second that. I for one never paid attention to that for on-and-off, mostly very light usage of LAVA for some 10 years (i.e. I started yet with the previous version which might look different at all). And indeed, it won't make any difference until may want to start querying job results. And I would like to share a story of what that difference costed me. Here's a patch I submitted in June 2017: https://git.linaro.org/ci/job/configs.git/commit/lite-aeolus/lava-job-defin… with a commit message and inline comment of: "For some reason, LAVA doesn't allow to query by real job name, so we need to duplicate it as metadata." Here's another patch which I submitted based on the analysis I present here: https://review.linaro.org/c/ci/job/configs/+/34677 So, for almost 3 years I lived with a misconception that LAVA can't query by a job name. Call it an extreme case. Call me dumb. Say that there's autocompletion for field names and any person with some agility of mind would type different characters and would notice "description" as available field. Yeah, I did all that. But I'm with me from 3 years ago: for me, "job name" is "zephyr-net-ping #823-2ac65a24". "job description" would be something like "Ping Zephyr dumb_http_server sample with packets of different size and interval". To the best of my knowledge, there's no such a field in jobdef YAML to include such a description, and I definitely don't include it in my jobs, so never would I try to search anything in "description", for the lack thereof in my jobs. Unless I have too much time to apply random "genetic algorithms" to LAVA UI or just do exhaustive search thru it. Which I usually don't have time for (I'm not a test engineer, but a developer, with "test that code" always in backlog). Until recently, when testing debt has really become pressing, and I decided to face all "skeletons in closed" I had with LAVA ;-). So, even 3 years haven't passed until I "did my homework" on searching jobs by name. But my point would be that there should be no need for any "homework" regarding these matters, it all should just work right away without double-thinking and guesswork. And I would consider this a genuine bug. I'm less sure about fixing though. Because it's not a matter of just changing a few UI labels. It's more pervasive, as e.g. this URL shows: https://lite.validation.linaro.org/results/query/+custom?entity=testjob&con… And seeing that URL, one can actually conjecture how that "description" appeared in the UI: it's actually name of the database table. Which just bled into system public interface. Too bad, because another public interface uses "job name" for that field, and internal naming like db fields shouldn't prevail. Anyway, I'm not going to argue that DB should be migrated, and it won't help, as we definitely don't want to break existing queries, etc. So, the only way to fix that would be to alias existing "description" to clearer "name" (or "jobname", "job_name"), and perform mapping on DB access. I'm note sure if it's worth. Based on my experience, I'd go for it, and it doesn't sounds like rocker science. But only maintainers could imagine how kludgy it would be in the actual LAVA database and if it's worth it, taking into account other tasks and priorities. Thanks for reading the story (rant?). -- Best Regards, Paul Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog

5 years, 3 months

Sample docker-compose.yml file to detect adb devices in "lava-dispatcher"

by koti koti

Hi, I am facing the issue while porting Host's "adb-devices" to lava-dispatcher docker. Please can some one provide the right steps to detect "adb-devices" in "lava-dispatcher" docker? Current steps: (still my lava-dispatcher fail to detect the Host's "adb-devices") ########### 1. Lauch the LAVA-lab using "docker-compose up" from the repo " https://github.com/danrue/lava-docker-compose.git" 2. add "/dev/bus/usb" , "/etc/udev/rules.d" and "privileged: True" to "lava-dispatcher" i.e " dispatcher: image: lavasoftware/lava-dispatcher:2019.12 container_name: lava_dispatcher privileged: True devices: - /dev/kvm # needed for QEMU - /dev/net/tun # needed for QEMU - /dev/bus/usb cap_add: - NET_ADMIN # needed for QEMU environment: - "DISPATCHER_HOSTNAME=--hostname=dispatcher" - "LOGGER_URL=tcp://server:5555" # url to send logs - "MASTER_URL=tcp://server:5556" # url of lava master volumes: - '/boot:/boot:ro' - '/lib/modules:/lib/modules:ro' - '/dev/bus/usb:/dev/bus/usb' - '/etc/udev/rules.d:/etc/udev/rules.d'" 3. Run the command #docker-compose up 4. Login to lava-dispatcher #docker exec -it <dispatcher-name" bash #apt-get update;apt-get install android-tools-adb android-tools-fastboot usbutils #adb devices Can some one let me know the steps to detect my host's "adb-devices" in lava-dispatcher's docker? Regards, Koti

5 years, 3 months

test/tests execution on provision (booted) board with out "-boot" section. (Basically I am skipping deploy and boot sections)

by koti koti

Hi, I am able to boot and run the tests with Provisioned(booted) board using attached YAML i.e "working_yaml.yaml". But, I am facing the issue while running the tests on Provisioned (booted) board with out "-boot" section. (you can see my YAML file as mentioned below which I have used now) Please can some one help me for the same? 1. Basically I am facing the connection issue with out "-boot" section. 2. Why this dependency to connect terminal for boot section ? ( I am able to connect serial port when I use "-boot" section in yaml file) 3. Please can some one provide me right YAML to run my tests with out "-boot" section. ( to resolve serial connection issue with out "-boot" section) " device_type: beaglebone-black job_name: begalbone healthcheck timeouts: job: minutes: 30 action: minutes: 15 connection: minutes: 5 priority: medium visibility: public context: test_character_delay: 10 actions: #- boot: # timeout: # minutes: 15 # method: minimal ## reset: false ## auto_login: ## login_prompt: '.* login:' ## username: root # prompts: # - root@dragonboard-410c:~# - test: interactive: - name: reset prompts: ["#"] script: - name: reset command: reset " Regards, Koti

5 years, 3 months

Re: [Lava-users] LAVA RESTful API feedback and plans (Stevan Radakovi?)

by Larry Shen

Interesting topic, one question: What will the new LAVA rest api look? a) or b) ? I wish it could b), then we could ease our master's pressure... a) Django-rest-framework alike, synchronous b) Tornado alike, asynchronous -----Original Message----- From: Lava-users <lava-users-bounces(a)lists.lavasoftware.org> On Behalf Of lava-users-request(a)lists.lavasoftware.org Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 8:00 PM To: lava-users(a)lists.lavasoftware.org Subject: [EXT] Lava-users Digest, Vol 19, Issue 2 Caution: EXT Email Send Lava-users mailing list submissions to lava-users(a)lists.lavasoftware.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.lav… or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to lava-users-request(a)lists.lavasoftware.org You can reach the person managing the list at lava-users-owner(a)lists.lavasoftware.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Lava-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. LAVA RESTful API feedback and plans (Stevan Radakovi?) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 09:17:00 +0100 From: Stevan Radakovi? <stevan.radakovic(a)linaro.org> To: "lava-users(a)lists.lavasoftware.org" <lava-users(a)lists.lavasoftware.org> Subject: [Lava-users] LAVA RESTful API feedback and plans Message-ID: <34b9c19d-b0eb-2d85-0c85-a4e536a1812e(a)linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" Hello community, With the LAVA release of 2020.02 we now have a REST API framework that we fell covers all the functionalities of the already existing XMLRPC API. Since the long-term plan is to drop the XMLRPC support, we now encourage everyone to use REST and we also would like to hear feedback about any additional features that you'd like to see as part of the REST API. Our plan is to slowly move lavacli <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.lava…> project to use REST API exclusively, after that we will schedule the deprecation of the XMLRPC API. Cheers, -- Stevan Radakovi? | LAVA Engineer Linaro.org <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.linaro.org&data…> ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

5 years, 3 months

How to change defalut "soft reboot" commands in LAVA

by koti koti

Hi, Right now I am trying to run tests on Provisioned(booted) board with out using physical Power switches . But, I am seeing below soft reboot lines while using the attached YAML file, " start: 1 minimal-boot (timeout 00:15:00) [common] start: 1.1 connect-device (timeout 00:15:00) [common] [common] connect-device Connecting to device using 'telnet ser2net 5001' end: 1.1 connect-device (duration 00:00:01) [common] start: 1.2 reset-device (timeout 00:14:59) [common] start: 1.2.1 send-reboot-commands (timeout 00:14:59) [common] No soft reboot command defined in the test job. Using defaults. reboot reboot reboot -n reboot -n reboot -nf reboot -nf " I want to change my soft reboot command as "reset" instead of "reboot"/"reboot -n"/"reboot -nf". Please can some one let me know as how can I change default soft reboot command to "reset" ? Regards, Koti

5 years, 3 months

LAVA tests execution on already provisioned (boot) begalbone board

by koti koti

Hi, I have successfully booted the Beagelbone board from " https://github.com/danrue/lava.therub.org" . (corresponding ymal is https://github.com/danrue/lava.therub.org/blob/master/server-overlay/etc/la… ) But, now I am trying to run one more scenario (may be new scenario and not sure is it supported by LAVA lab?) i.e 1. Run the tests on already provisioned (boot) beagelbone board. (Basically I am skipping the booting mentioned and trying to run on the already provisioned/boot board) a) boot the target b) Connect Board to LAVA lab c) Just check the login prompt ("#") is available or not? c) Run the using below test definition file (Basically this test definition file runs "ls"/"ifconfig" commands in the already provisioned(boot) board). " device_type: beaglebone-black job_name: beaglebone-black healthcheck timeouts: job: minutes: 10 action: minutes: 5 priority: high visibility: public actions: - test: interactive: - name: ls test prompts: ["#"] echo: discard script: - name: ls command: ls successes: - message: "ls simple test successes" failures: - message: "TIMEOUT" exception: InfrastructureError error: "ls command failed" - name: ifconfig command: ifconfig - name: wait for the prompt command: " I have tried to run this. But, my test failed with the error ""Connection closed"" (Attached screenshot) Can some one let me know solution to fix this error? Regards, koti

5 years, 3 months

LAVA RESTful API feedback and plans

by Stevan Radaković

Hello community, With the LAVA release of 2020.02 we now have a REST API framework that we fell covers all the functionalities of the already existing XMLRPC API. Since the long-term plan is to drop the XMLRPC support, we now encourage everyone to use REST and we also would like to hear feedback about any additional features that you'd like to see as part of the REST API. Our plan is to slowly move lavacli <https://docs.lavasoftware.org/lavacli/> project to use REST API exclusively, after that we will schedule the deprecation of the XMLRPC API. Cheers, -- Stevan Radaković | LAVA Engineer Linaro.org <www.linaro.org> │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

5 years, 3 months

← Newer
1
...
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
...
93
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

lava-users