On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 at 09:35, LABBE Corentin clabbe@baylibre.com wrote:

Hello

I have a cubietruck in LAVA, but its devicetype does not follow the rule "devicetype should be the same as devicetree name".

That isn't a rule imposed by LAVA, some labs choose to do it that way. The DeviceType name can be anything which is unique to the instance - a cubietruck could just as easily be a DeviceType A20 or Allwinner20 or cubie etc.

As long as the device dictionary extends the correct device-type Jinja2 file, everything is fine.

Diverting from this rule, make difficult to find if the device is already handled by LAVA. I have lots of other boards which suffer the same problem (odroid-xu3 for example)

Do you already have a process for renaming devicetype ?

It's not recommended because the new device-type is a new database object, it's a bit like starting again at job #1.

If not, why about duplicating to the correct name (sun7i-a20-cubietruck) and adding some tags (comment like "{# set deprecated = true}") to the old one.

A single DUT can only be a single DeviceType, as set in the device dictionary.

The DeviceType is only a database object, it has no effect on how tests are run - that is all down to the extends line of the device dictionary. You aren't proposing to change the instructions for how to run tests on the DUT, so there's no need for a new device-type.

Use aliases.

https://staging.validation.linaro.org/static/docs/v2/glossary.html#term-alia...

The deprectation warning could be printed by the LAVA web interface like the warning about not having health checks. After some release, the deprecated devicetype could be removed.

Regards _______________________________________________ Lava-users mailing list Lava-users@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lava-users